TMUS · NASDAQ · STOCK
T-Mobile US Inc.
$173.37
52W $165.66 – $261.56
53/100
$190.07B
18.5
0.33
Is TMUS Bullish or Bearish?
Mixed.
Innellis AI committee rates T-Mobile US Inc. (TMUS) Watch with a composite score of 53/100
, based on 6 analysts with 50% agreement.
Last updated August 09, 2026.
What Would Change This View
- Upgrade to Buy
- Requires a committee score of 60.0 — +6.56 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
- Downgrade to Reduce
- Requires the score to fall below 40.0 — -13.44 from today. The band boundary is 45.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.
Executive Summary
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 1.56) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull & Bear Case
Bull Case
- ROE of 18.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
- News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 82 articles, 14d) — News
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 1.56 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -9.8% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.56) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk
- Current ratio of 1.00 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or
forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)
AI Investment Committee
Committee Consensus
As of August 09, 2026
Overall Committee Score
53/100
Agreement
50%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 83%
of 31 Communication Services peers
Value Analyst
neutral
56
/ 100 · High confidence
Fair value -- neither a bargain nor obviously overpriced
+ ROE of 18.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− Debt-to-equity of 1.56 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case
Growth Analyst
neutral
48
/ 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
− EPS declining -9.8% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst
neutral
49
/ 100 · High confidence
Mixed or range-bound price action
+ Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement
− Price structure making lower highs and lower lows
Risk Analyst
bearish
33
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Elevated risk from leverage, volatility, event exposure, or portfolio concentration -- size accordingly
− High leverage (debt-to-equity 1.56) amplifies downside in a stress scenario
Macro Analyst
bullish
70
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
+ Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing)
News Analyst
bullish
64
/ 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.20 across 82 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager
neutral
55
/ 100 · Moderate confidence
Portfolio-level factors are mixed -- worth a deliberate sizing decision, not a default-size position
+ Portfolio position concentration is currently healthy
− 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Investment Thesis Evolution
Committee score weakened from 60.5 to 53.4.
- Recommendation changed from Buy to Watch.
- Committee agreement fell notably from 60% to 50%.
- New bearish signals: 4 appeared.
- New bullish signals: 1 appeared.
- Analyst(s) changed stance: Growth Analyst.
- New analyst(s) joined: Value Analyst.
Analyst-level changes:
- Growth Analyst: stance bullish->neutral; score 85->48 (-37); +1 bearish signal(s).
- Risk Analyst: +2 bearish signal(s).
- Value Analyst joined: neutral at 56.
Comparing 2026-08-08 to 2026-08-09 (1 day apart).
Technical Analysis
RSI (14)
46.7
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.479
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Downtrend
Weekly: Downtrend
Market Structure
Mixed
Support
$165.72
Resistance
$224.60
Bollinger %B
0.33
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$177.80
Below
EMA 21
$180.01
Below
EMA 50
$183.29
Below
EMA 200
$198.35
Below
Fundamental Analysis
Valuation
86
Growth
75
Profitability
72
Financial Health
16
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio
18.5×
P/B Ratio
3.41×
PEG Ratio
-1.87
Dividend Yield
2.22%
52W High
$261.56
52W Low
$165.66
Quality & Growth
ROE
1856.7%
ROA
501.4%
Gross Margin
5445.6%
Operating Margin
2029.9%
Revenue Growth YoY
—
Debt / Equity
2.06
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 18.5 (inexpensive relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 3.4x; PEG ratio of -1.9 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 18.6%; Return on assets of 5.0%; Net margin of 11.5%; Gross margin of 54.5%; Current ratio of 0.92 (tight short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 2.06; Free cash flow per share is positive (14.63); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 13.0%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth accelerating (+20.7% -> +31.7% QoQ); Average YoY EPS growth of 5.3%; Analyst estimates rising over recent quarters
Get the Full TMUS Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →