ADI vs AMAT
Analog Devices vs Applied Materials — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ADI
Analog Devices
64
Buy
VS
AMAT
Applied Materials
56
Buy
| Metric | ADI | AMAT |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
56
|
| Price |
$371.27
|
$484.51
|
| P/E Ratio |
44.05×
|
42.19×
|
| ROE |
6.7%
|
34.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
65.8%
|
49.4%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.27×
|
0.29×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.1%
|
0.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
42.4
|
38.4
|
| Beta |
1.212
|
1.618
|
| Expected Upside |
+19.4%
|
+50.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ADI versus AMAT.
ADI leads by 8 points.
ADI scores 64/100 (Buy) versus AMAT at 56/100 (Buy).
ADI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.25) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is p/e of 56.8 is expensive by classic value standards. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 29.8% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 83.2% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 56.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
AMAT Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 38.4% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 20.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 39.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 38.4% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 45.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 9.0x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical