AME vs IR
Ametek vs Ingersoll Rand — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | AME | IR |
| AI Score |
70
|
69
|
| Price |
$256.07
|
$85.02
|
| P/E Ratio |
37.31×
|
34.70×
|
| ROE |
13.9%
|
5.8%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
36.6%
|
37.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.21×
|
0.47×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.1%
|
| RSI (14) |
67.3
|
54.1
|
| Beta |
0.99
|
1.168
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+2.9%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for AME versus IR.
AME leads by 1 points.
AME scores 70/100 (Buy) versus IR at 69/100 (Buy).
AME Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.21) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is p/e of 36.9 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 36.9 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Weekly RSI at 79 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
IR Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is p/e of 35.1 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- EPS growing 91.1% YoY — Growth
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 35.1 is moderate-to-rich — Value