ANET vs FTV
Arista Networks vs Fortive — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ANET
Arista Networks
66
Buy
VS
| Metric | ANET | FTV |
|---|
| AI Score |
66
|
71
|
| Price |
$188.64
|
$61.71
|
| P/E Ratio |
58.78×
|
35.88×
|
| ROE |
28.4%
|
9.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
63.0%
|
63.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.00×
|
0.58×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
59.8
|
56.5
|
| Beta |
1.601
|
0.98
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ANET versus FTV.
FTV leads by 5 points.
FTV scores 71/100 (Buy) versus ANET at 66/100 (Buy).
ANET Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is revenue growing 32.6% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. The main limiting factor is p/e of 58.8 is expensive by classic value standards. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 30.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 32.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 58.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 13.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
FTV Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Both daily and weekly trends are bearish — strong multi-timeframe downtrend.