ANET vs LRCX
Arista Networks vs Lam Research — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ANET
Arista Networks
66
Buy
VS
| Metric | ANET | LRCX |
| AI Score |
66
|
64
|
| Price |
$188.64
|
$311.31
|
| P/E Ratio |
58.78×
|
53.77×
|
| ROE |
28.4%
|
58.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
63.0%
|
50.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.00×
|
0.30×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
59.8
|
53.1
|
| Beta |
1.601
|
1.805
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+40.8%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ANET versus LRCX.
ANET leads by 2 points.
ANET scores 66/100 (Buy) versus LRCX at 64/100 (Buy).
ANET Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is revenue growing 32.6% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. The main limiting factor is p/e of 58.8 is expensive by classic value standards. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 30.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 32.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 58.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 13.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
LRCX Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- ROE of 67.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 26.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 38.6% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 53.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 41.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 28.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk