BNY vs FDS
BNY Mellon vs FactSet — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | BNY | FDS |
|---|
| AI Score |
68
|
58
|
| Price |
$163.09
|
$301.04
|
| P/E Ratio |
18.79×
|
19.99×
|
| ROE |
12.5%
|
27.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
59.1%
|
51.4%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.38×
|
0.77×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.4%
|
1.5%
|
| RSI (14) |
58.2
|
73.9
|
| Beta |
1.049
|
0.687
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+0.2%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for BNY versus FDS.
BNY leads by 10 points.
BNY scores 68/100 (Buy) versus FDS at 58/100 (Buy).
BNY Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is eps growing 31.7% yoy. Most analysts agree, and no major concerns are blocking a stronger rating.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 0.0x is a discount to asset value — Value
- EPS growing 31.7% YoY — Growth
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
FDS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is bollinger bandwidth of 15.4% signals elevated volatility. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 26.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 6.5x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Weekly RSI at 76 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 15.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk