CACI vs FTV
CACI International vs Fortive — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CACI
CACI International
59
Buy
VS
| Metric | CACI | FTV |
|---|
| AI Score |
59
|
66
|
| Price |
$636.58
|
$60.48
|
| P/E Ratio |
26.21×
|
35.15×
|
| ROE |
12.0%
|
9.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
21.6%
|
63.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.20×
|
0.58×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
54.8
|
50.2
|
| Beta |
0.541
|
0.976
|
| Expected Upside |
+7.0%
|
+3.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CACI versus FTV.
FTV leads by 7 points.
FTV scores 66/100 (Buy) versus CACI at 59/100 (Buy).
CACI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 52.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 27.8 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 52.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk
FTV Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical