CDNS vs NTES
Cadence Design Systems vs NetEase, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems
68
Buy
VS
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
67
Buy
| Metric | CDNS | NTES |
|---|
| AI Score |
68
|
67
|
| Price |
$323.35
|
$124.46
|
| P/E Ratio |
64.19×
|
15.68×
|
| ROE |
20.3%
|
21.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
88.5%
|
65.7%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.36×
|
0.07×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
2.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
33.7
|
42.3
|
| Beta |
1.142
|
0.8
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.0%
|
+9.0%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CDNS versus NTES.
CDNS leads by 1 points.
CDNS scores 68/100 (Buy) versus NTES at 67/100 (Buy).
CDNS Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
NTES Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 21.6% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.04) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical