CGNX vs TTWO
Cognex vs Take-Two Interactive — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive
64
Buy
| Metric | CGNX | TTWO |
|---|
| AI Score |
65
|
64
|
| Price |
$64.36
|
$253.52
|
| P/E Ratio |
63.70×
|
-142.49×
|
| ROE |
7.7%
|
-8.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
68.9%
|
56.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.04×
|
0.29×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
54.3
|
58.7
|
| Beta |
1.492
|
0.983
|
| Expected Upside |
+7.0%
|
+5.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CGNX versus TTWO.
CGNX leads by 1 points.
CGNX scores 65/100 (Buy) versus TTWO at 64/100 (Buy).
CGNX Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 20.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 20.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk
TTWO Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). The main limiting factor is growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical