CLH vs TTC
Clean Harbors vs Toro — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | CLH | TTC |
|---|
| AI Score |
68
|
71
|
| Price |
$309.95
|
$98.68
|
| P/E Ratio |
37.26×
|
28.63×
|
| ROE |
14.2%
|
21.8%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
26.6%
|
33.3%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.04×
|
0.83×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
1.6%
|
| RSI (14) |
48.0
|
68.8
|
| Beta |
0.863
|
0.699
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.8%
|
+1.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CLH versus TTC.
TTC leads by 3 points.
TTC scores 71/100 (Buy) versus CLH at 68/100 (Buy).
CLH Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
TTC Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 3 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Stochastic RSI (92.6) confirms overbought conditions.
- Risk/reward is unfavorable: 4.2% downside vs 1.3% upside.