CR vs J
Crane vs Jacobs Solutions — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
J
Jacobs Solutions
55
Watch
| Metric | CR | J |
|---|
| AI Score |
53
|
55
|
| Price |
$205.91
|
$150.81
|
| P/E Ratio |
35.64×
|
52.83×
|
| ROE |
17.8%
|
8.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
41.7%
|
22.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.51×
|
1.24×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.9%
|
| RSI (14) |
28.3
|
76.9
|
| Beta |
1.094
|
0.667
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.8%
|
+0.7%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CR versus J.
J leads by 2 points.
J scores 55/100 (Watch) versus CR at 53/100 (Watch).
CR Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Technical Analyst remains cautious — rsi at 28 is in oversold territory (could mean either capitulation or a bounce setup). This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 16.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 37.7 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 5.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- EPS declining -4.7% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
J Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 60.2% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 49.8 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 60.2% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 103.6% YoY — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 49.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 4.8x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth