CRL vs NVST
Charles River Laboratories vs Envista Holdings — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
CRL
Charles River Laboratories
61
Buy
VS
NVST
Envista Holdings
68
Buy
| Metric | CRL | NVST |
|---|
| AI Score |
61
|
68
|
| Price |
$297.55
|
$27.47
|
| P/E Ratio |
-61.69×
|
46.34×
|
| ROE |
-4.6%
|
1.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
32.2%
|
55.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.07×
|
0.52×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
79.8
|
44.8
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
0.861
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.4%
|
+4.6%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CRL versus NVST.
NVST leads by 7 points.
NVST scores 68/100 (Buy) versus CRL at 61/100 (Buy).
CRL Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 35.8% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- RSI at 80 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 87 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 35.8% signals elevated volatility — Risk
NVST Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical