CRUS vs FTV
Cirrus Logic vs Fortive — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | CRUS | FTV |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
71
|
| Price |
$124.89
|
$61.71
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.78×
|
35.88×
|
| ROE |
19.5%
|
9.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
52.8%
|
63.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.08×
|
0.58×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
32.2
|
56.5
|
| Beta |
1.163
|
0.98
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.7%
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for CRUS versus FTV.
FTV leads by 7 points.
FTV scores 71/100 (Buy) versus CRUS at 64/100 (Buy).
CRUS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is eps growing 31.0% yoy. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 20.2% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 31.0% YoY — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 24 -- oversold on the larger timeframe too — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 16.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk
FTV Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Both daily and weekly trends are bearish — strong multi-timeframe downtrend.