DV vs LRCX
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. vs Lam Research — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
DV
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
56
Watch
VS
| Metric | DV | LRCX |
|---|
| AI Score |
56
|
68
|
| Price |
$13.24
|
$311.33
|
| P/E Ratio |
35.81×
|
53.78×
|
| ROE |
4.5%
|
58.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
80.4%
|
50.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.10×
|
0.30×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
76.9
|
49.9
|
| Beta |
0.972
|
1.865
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+43.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for DV versus LRCX.
LRCX leads by 12 points.
LRCX scores 68/100 (Buy) versus DV at 56/100 (Watch).
DV Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Growth Analyst remains cautious. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.01) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
- P/E of 34.5 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- RSI at 77 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 27.7% signals elevated volatility — Risk
LRCX Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Most analysts agree, and no major concerns are blocking a stronger rating.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 27.3% signals elevated volatility — Risk