FFIV vs TTWO
F5, Inc. vs Take-Two Interactive — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive
64
Buy
| Metric | FFIV | TTWO |
|---|
| AI Score |
66
|
64
|
| Price |
$409.69
|
$253.52
|
| P/E Ratio |
31.51×
|
-142.49×
|
| ROE |
19.3%
|
-8.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
82.2%
|
56.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.06×
|
0.29×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
44.9
|
58.7
|
| Beta |
1.033
|
0.983
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+5.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FFIV versus TTWO.
FFIV leads by 2 points.
FFIV scores 66/100 (Buy) versus TTWO at 64/100 (Buy).
FFIV Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is p/e of 31.6 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 19.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 31.6 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 5.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
TTWO Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). The main limiting factor is growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical