FHN vs NWG
First Horizon vs NatWest Group plc — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
NWG
NatWest Group plc
64
Buy
| Metric | FHN | NWG |
|---|
| AI Score |
72
|
64
|
| Price |
$25.44
|
$19.05
|
| P/E Ratio |
12.05×
|
7.45×
|
| ROE |
11.1%
|
13.7%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
75.4%
|
58.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.47×
|
4.29×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.5%
|
4.6%
|
| RSI (14) |
37.8
|
59.6
|
| Beta |
0.622
|
0.815
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.5%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FHN versus NWG.
FHN leads by 8 points.
FHN scores 72/100 (Buy) versus NWG at 64/100 (Buy).
FHN Committee View
100% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is revenue growing 64.2% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 11.4 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.3x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
NWG Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 75.1% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 2.65) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 8.9 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 4.9% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 2.65 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 2.65) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk