FISV vs FTV
Fiserv vs Fortive — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | FISV | FTV |
|---|
| AI Score |
58
|
66
|
| Price |
$52.59
|
$59.79
|
| P/E Ratio |
10.15×
|
35.15×
|
| ROE |
13.5%
|
9.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
47.2%
|
63.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.04×
|
0.58×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
51.9
|
50.2
|
| Beta |
0.798
|
0.976
|
| Expected Upside |
+21.8%
|
+3.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FISV versus FTV.
FTV leads by 8 points.
FTV scores 66/100 (Buy) versus FISV at 58/100 (Buy).
FISV Committee View
40% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 10.0 is inexpensive for the broad market. Growth Analyst remains cautious — revenue declining -1.2% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 10.0 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.4x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Revenue declining -1.2% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- EPS declining -12.9% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
FTV Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical