FISV vs QBTS
Fiserv vs D-Wave Quantum Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum Inc.
52
Watch
| Metric | FISV | QBTS |
|---|
| AI Score |
69
|
52
|
| Price |
$52.70
|
$20.23
|
| P/E Ratio |
10.10×
|
-28.50×
|
| ROE |
13.5%
|
-41.7%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
47.2%
|
64.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.04×
|
0.04×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
43.1
|
54.6
|
| Beta |
0.819
|
2.164
|
| Expected Upside |
+23.5%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FISV versus QBTS.
FISV leads by 17 points.
FISV scores 69/100 (Buy) versus QBTS at 52/100 (Watch).
FISV Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
QBTS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Growth Analyst remains cautious — revenue declining -44.2% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.04) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 10.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- ROE of only -26.7% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Revenue declining -44.2% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth