FTI vs PTEN
TechnipFMC vs Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
52
Watch
| Metric | FTI | PTEN |
|---|
| AI Score |
68
|
52
|
| Price |
$75.33
|
$11.07
|
| P/E Ratio |
25.71×
|
-47.94×
|
| ROE |
28.7%
|
-2.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
23.0%
|
14.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.38×
|
0.41×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.3%
|
3.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
63.5
|
66.9
|
| Beta |
0.718
|
0.649
|
| Expected Upside |
+4.8%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTI versus PTEN.
FTI leads by 16 points.
FTI scores 68/100 (Buy) versus PTEN at 52/100 (Watch).
FTI Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.16) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 35.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 35.9% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 5.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
PTEN Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Growth Analyst remains cautious — revenue declining -9.4% yoy -- this is not a growth story right now. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 0.7x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 3.6% pays you to wait — Value
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -3.7% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Revenue declining -9.4% YoY -- this is not a growth story right now — Growth
- Bollinger bandwidth of 20.8% signals elevated volatility — Risk