FTNT vs GEN
Fortinet vs Gen Digital — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | FTNT | GEN |
|---|
| AI Score |
65
|
62
|
| Price |
$155.79
|
$27.41
|
| P/E Ratio |
55.95×
|
16.37×
|
| ROE |
149.8%
|
37.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
80.4%
|
78.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.32×
|
3.08×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
1.8%
|
| RSI (14) |
48.0
|
53.0
|
| Beta |
1.058
|
1.201
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTNT versus GEN.
FTNT leads by 3 points.
FTNT scores 65/100 (Buy) versus GEN at 62/100 (Buy).
FTNT Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is p/e of 56.4 is expensive by classic value standards. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 187.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 56.4 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 47.7x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
GEN Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 3.14) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 41.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 79.7% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 3.14 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.14) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk