FTNT vs LFUS
Fortinet vs Littelfuse — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | FTNT | LFUS |
|---|
| AI Score |
69
|
65
|
| Price |
$159.58
|
$456.78
|
| P/E Ratio |
55.82×
|
-1170.64×
|
| ROE |
149.8%
|
-3.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
80.4%
|
39.3%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.32×
|
0.27×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.7%
|
| RSI (14) |
50.7
|
67.2
|
| Beta |
1.09
|
1.489
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+9.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTNT versus LFUS.
FTNT leads by 4 points.
FTNT scores 69/100 (Buy) versus LFUS at 65/100 (Buy).
FTNT Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
LFUS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is roe of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk