FTV vs MANH
Fortive vs Manhattan Associates — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
MANH
Manhattan Associates
64
Buy
| Metric | FTV | MANH |
|---|
| AI Score |
71
|
64
|
| Price |
$61.71
|
$195.13
|
| P/E Ratio |
35.88×
|
55.46×
|
| ROE |
9.0%
|
69.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
63.2%
|
54.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.58×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.4%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
56.5
|
69.4
|
| Beta |
0.98
|
0.971
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.1%
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTV versus MANH.
FTV leads by 7 points.
FTV scores 71/100 (Buy) versus MANH at 64/100 (Buy).
FTV Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Both daily and weekly trends are bearish — strong multi-timeframe downtrend.
MANH Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk