FTV vs TTWO
Fortive vs Take-Two Interactive — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive
64
Buy
| Metric | FTV | TTWO |
|---|
| AI Score |
71
|
64
|
| Price |
$61.77
|
$253.52
|
| P/E Ratio |
35.88×
|
-142.49×
|
| ROE |
9.0%
|
-8.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
63.2%
|
56.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.58×
|
0.29×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.4%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
56.5
|
58.7
|
| Beta |
0.976
|
0.983
|
| Expected Upside |
+1.1%
|
+5.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for FTV versus TTWO.
FTV leads by 7 points.
FTV scores 71/100 (Buy) versus TTWO at 64/100 (Buy).
FTV Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 3 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Both daily and weekly trends are bearish — strong multi-timeframe downtrend.
TTWO Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is market regime is bullish (bull market -- normal position sizing). The main limiting factor is growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical