GEN vs MANH
Gen Digital vs Manhattan Associates — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
MANH
Manhattan Associates
66
Buy
| Metric | GEN | MANH |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
66
|
| Price |
$29.32
|
$213.09
|
| P/E Ratio |
16.73×
|
60.56×
|
| ROE |
37.3%
|
69.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
78.0%
|
54.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
3.08×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.7%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
62.8
|
75.8
|
| Beta |
1.201
|
0.928
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.3%
|
+7.6%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for GEN versus MANH.
MANH leads by 3 points.
MANH scores 66/100 (Buy) versus GEN at 63/100 (Buy).
GEN Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.75 across 4 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 41.9% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 79.7% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 3.14 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
MANH Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is rsi at 76 is in overbought territory. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- RSI at 76 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 79 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 21.3% signals elevated volatility — Risk