GRMN vs MANH
Garmin vs Manhattan Associates — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
MANH
Manhattan Associates
64
Buy
| Metric | GRMN | MANH |
|---|
| AI Score |
66
|
64
|
| Price |
$311.10
|
$195.13
|
| P/E Ratio |
31.89×
|
55.46×
|
| ROE |
18.5%
|
69.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
60.1%
|
54.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.02×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.2%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
81.9
|
69.4
|
| Beta |
0.914
|
0.971
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for GRMN versus MANH.
GRMN leads by 2 points.
GRMN scores 66/100 (Buy) versus MANH at 64/100 (Buy).
GRMN Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is p/e of 31.9 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 21.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 31.9 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- RSI at 82 is in overbought territory — Technical
MANH Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk