IONQ vs JKHY
IonQ, Inc. vs Jack Henry & Associates — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates
70
Buy
| Metric | IONQ | JKHY |
| AI Score |
63
|
70
|
| Price |
$43.42
|
$153.53
|
| P/E Ratio |
-10.13×
|
21.46×
|
| ROE |
-13.4%
|
21.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
36.3%
|
44.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.02×
|
0.04×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
1.5%
|
| RSI (14) |
63.7
|
52.8
|
| Beta |
3.301
|
0.553
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+17.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for IONQ versus JKHY.
JKHY leads by 7 points.
JKHY scores 70/100 (Buy) versus IONQ at 63/100 (Buy).
IONQ Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 334.6% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 51.6 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 334.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
- P/E of 51.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 23.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 39.5% signals elevated volatility — Risk
JKHY Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical