IR vs ROAD
Ingersoll Rand vs Construction Partners, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
ROAD
Construction Partners, Inc.
54
Watch
| Metric | IR | ROAD |
|---|
| AI Score |
69
|
54
|
| Price |
$85.02
|
$120.83
|
| P/E Ratio |
34.70×
|
47.18×
|
| ROE |
5.8%
|
11.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
37.9%
|
15.8%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.47×
|
1.82×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.1%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
54.1
|
71.1
|
| Beta |
1.168
|
0.901
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.9%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for IR versus ROAD.
IR leads by 15 points.
IR scores 69/100 (Buy) versus ROAD at 54/100 (Watch).
IR Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is p/e of 35.1 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- EPS growing 91.1% YoY — Growth
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 35.1 is moderate-to-rich — Value
ROAD Committee View
33% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 41.9% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 47.2 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 41.9% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 87.5% YoY — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 47.2 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 7.8x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Debt-to-equity of 1.77 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value