LFUS vs LRCX
Littelfuse vs Lam Research — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | LFUS | LRCX |
|---|
| AI Score |
65
|
64
|
| Price |
$456.78
|
$311.31
|
| P/E Ratio |
-1170.64×
|
53.77×
|
| ROE |
-3.0%
|
58.3%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
39.3%
|
50.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.27×
|
0.30×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.7%
|
0.3%
|
| RSI (14) |
67.2
|
53.1
|
| Beta |
1.489
|
1.805
|
| Expected Upside |
+9.3%
|
+40.8%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LFUS versus LRCX.
LFUS leads by 1 points.
LFUS scores 65/100 (Buy) versus LRCX at 64/100 (Buy).
LFUS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is roe of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk
LRCX Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- ROE of 67.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 26.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 38.6% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 53.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 41.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 28.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk