LFUS vs MANH
Littelfuse vs Manhattan Associates — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
MANH
Manhattan Associates
64
Buy
| Metric | LFUS | MANH |
|---|
| AI Score |
65
|
64
|
| Price |
$456.78
|
$195.13
|
| P/E Ratio |
-1170.64×
|
55.46×
|
| ROE |
-3.0%
|
69.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
39.3%
|
54.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.27×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.7%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
67.2
|
69.4
|
| Beta |
1.489
|
0.971
|
| Expected Upside |
+9.3%
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LFUS versus MANH.
LFUS leads by 1 points.
LFUS scores 65/100 (Buy) versus MANH at 64/100 (Buy).
LFUS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is roe of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk
MANH Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk