LFUS vs SANM
Littelfuse vs Sanmina Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
65
Buy
| Metric | LFUS | SANM |
|---|
| AI Score |
65
|
65
|
| Price |
$456.78
|
$202.71
|
| P/E Ratio |
-1170.64×
|
35.57×
|
| ROE |
-3.0%
|
10.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
39.3%
|
9.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.27×
|
0.95×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.7%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
67.2
|
52.5
|
| Beta |
1.489
|
1.561
|
| Expected Upside |
+9.3%
|
+42.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LFUS versus SANM.
The committee scores are tied.
LFUS and SANM both score 65/100.
LFUS Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is roe of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- ROE of only -0.3% -- cheap may mean cheap for a reason — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 22.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk
SANM Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.60 across 42 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is p/e of 35.3 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 58.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 35.3 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Bollinger bandwidth of 29.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk