LRCX vs MANH
Lam Research vs Manhattan Associates — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
MANH
Manhattan Associates
64
Buy
| Metric | LRCX | MANH |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
64
|
| Price |
$311.31
|
$195.13
|
| P/E Ratio |
53.77×
|
55.46×
|
| ROE |
58.3%
|
69.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
50.5%
|
54.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.30×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.3%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
53.1
|
69.4
|
| Beta |
1.805
|
0.971
|
| Expected Upside |
+40.8%
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LRCX versus MANH.
The committee scores are tied.
LRCX and MANH both score 64/100.
LRCX Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- ROE of 67.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 26.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 38.6% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 53.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 41.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 28.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
MANH Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk