LRCX vs NTAP
Lam Research vs NetApp — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | LRCX | NTAP |
|---|
| AI Score |
68
|
69
|
| Price |
$332.44
|
$207.10
|
| P/E Ratio |
57.40×
|
32.21×
|
| ROE |
58.3%
|
94.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
50.5%
|
70.7%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.33×
|
2.02×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.3%
|
1.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
66.7
|
82.8
|
| Beta |
1.865
|
1.433
|
| Expected Upside |
+31.9%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LRCX versus NTAP.
NTAP leads by 1 points.
NTAP scores 69/100 (Buy) versus LRCX at 68/100 (Buy).
LRCX Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is revenue growing 26.0% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. The main limiting factor is p/e of 56.2 is expensive by classic value standards. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 67.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 26.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 38.6% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 56.2 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 41.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 25.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk
NTAP Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is bollinger bandwidth of 31.4% signals elevated volatility. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 3 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- RSI at 83 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 85 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 31.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk