LRCX vs SANM
Lam Research vs Sanmina Corporation — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
65
Buy
| Metric | LRCX | SANM |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
65
|
| Price |
$311.31
|
$202.71
|
| P/E Ratio |
53.77×
|
35.57×
|
| ROE |
58.3%
|
10.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
50.5%
|
9.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.30×
|
0.95×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.3%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
53.1
|
52.5
|
| Beta |
1.805
|
1.561
|
| Expected Upside |
+40.8%
|
+42.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for LRCX versus SANM.
SANM leads by 1 points.
SANM scores 65/100 (Buy) versus LRCX at 64/100 (Buy).
LRCX Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is split. Analysts see this stock differently enough that the current rating reflects genuine uncertainty, not a weak signal.
Bull Case
- ROE of 67.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 26.0% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 38.6% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 53.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 41.2x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 28.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
SANM Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.60 across 42 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is p/e of 35.3 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 58.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 35.3 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Bollinger bandwidth of 29.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk