MANH vs TENB
Manhattan Associates vs Tenable Holdings, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
MANH
Manhattan Associates
71
Buy
VS
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
71
Buy
| Metric | MANH | TENB |
|---|
| AI Score |
71
|
71
|
| Price |
$196.53
|
$35.27
|
| P/E Ratio |
56.08×
|
612.30×
|
| ROE |
69.9%
|
-11.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
54.6%
|
78.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.34×
|
2.12×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
64.1
|
61.7
|
| Beta |
0.928
|
0.938
|
| Expected Upside |
+5.5%
|
+13.2%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for MANH versus TENB.
The committee scores are tied.
MANH and TENB both score 71/100.
MANH Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is bollinger bandwidth of 42.0% signals elevated volatility. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Weekly RSI at 76 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 42.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
TENB Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is daily trend (uptrend) conflicts with the weekly trend (downtrend) -- fighting the larger trend. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Daily trend (uptrend) conflicts with the weekly trend (downtrend) -- fighting the larger trend — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 30.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk