RRC vs SLB
Range Resources vs Schlumberger Limited — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
RRC
Range Resources
64
Buy
VS
SLB
Schlumberger Limited
61
Buy
| Metric | RRC | SLB |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
61
|
| Price |
$40.98
|
$53.30
|
| P/E Ratio |
11.26×
|
25.62×
|
| ROE |
15.2%
|
12.8%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
47.9%
|
16.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.22×
|
0.49×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.9%
|
2.2%
|
| RSI (14) |
62.1
|
55.8
|
| Beta |
0.433
|
0.749
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.5%
|
+10.3%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for RRC versus SLB.
RRC leads by 3 points.
RRC scores 64/100 (Buy) versus SLB at 61/100 (Buy).
RRC Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 10.9 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is current ratio of 0.67 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 10.9 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 19.3% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 82.0% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
- Current ratio of 0.67 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk
SLB Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is price structure making higher highs and higher lows. The main limiting factor is eps declining -29.4% yoy despite any revenue growth. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- EPS declining -29.4% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth