SEIC vs SMFG
SEI Investments Company vs Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
SEIC
SEI Investments Company
72
Buy
VS
SMFG
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
62
Buy
| Metric | SEIC | SMFG |
|---|
| AI Score |
72
|
62
|
| Price |
$104.67
|
$25.14
|
| P/E Ratio |
18.04×
|
14.85×
|
| ROE |
29.2%
|
10.6%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
67.3%
|
55.1%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.03×
|
3.67×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.0%
|
2.4%
|
| RSI (14) |
74.8
|
43.3
|
| Beta |
0.963
|
0.384
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for SEIC versus SMFG.
SEIC leads by 10 points.
SEIC scores 72/100 (Buy) versus SMFG at 62/100 (Buy).
SEIC Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- RSI at 75 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 85 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
SMFG Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 102.8% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 3.79) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
- Revenue growing 102.8% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 3.79 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- High leverage (debt-to-equity 3.79) amplifies downside in a stress scenario — Risk