Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
CDNA · NASDAQ · STOCK

CareDx (CDNA) Stock Analysis

Healthcare Updated October 14, 2026
$66.89
52W $14.03 – $72.51
64/100
$3.38B
30.4
2.38
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
64/100
Conviction: Unanimous · 100% agreement · 6 analysts
-73.8%
Unanimous

Is CDNA Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates CareDx, Inc (CDNA) Buy with a composite score of 64/100 , based on 6 analysts with 100% agreement. Last updated October 14, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +10.54 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -9.46 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The primary driver is news sentiment is positive (+0.40 across 5 articles, 14d). The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • ROE of 32.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
  • Revenue growing 34.4% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
  • EPS growing 227.0% YoY — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
  • P/E of 30.5 is moderate-to-rich — Value
  • Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
  • MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
  • Weekly RSI at 81 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
  • Bollinger bandwidth of 33.1% signals elevated volatility — Risk
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
64/100
Agreement
100%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Unanimous
Sector Rank
Top 7%
of 192 Healthcare peers
Value Analyst bullish
60 / 100 · High confidence
Classic value case: cheap on multiples with earnings power to back it up
+ ROE of 32.8% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation
− P/E of 30.5 is moderate-to-rich
Growth Analyst bullish
68 / 100 · High confidence
Strong, accelerating growth with consistent execution
+ Revenue growing 34.4% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum
− Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level
Technical Analyst bullish
61 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
− MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum
Risk Analyst bullish
62 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
− Bollinger bandwidth of 33.1% signals elevated volatility
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
70 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.40 across 5 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
35 / 100 · Low confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 67.0 to 64.5.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
  • Portfolio Manager: score 30->35 (+5).
  • Risk Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Technical Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
57.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.481
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Bollinger %B
0.64
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$64.06 Above
EMA 21
$61.41 Above
EMA 50
$54.36 Above
EMA 200
$35.76 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
47
Growth
51
Profitability
50
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 30.4×
P/B Ratio 7.91×
PEG Ratio -0.03
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $72.51
52W Low $14.03
Quality & Growth
ROE -704.5%
ROA -516.8%
Gross Margin 7058.2%
Operating Margin -92.4%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 0.05
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 30.4 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 7.9x; PEG ratio of -0.0 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of -7.0%; Return on assets of -5.2%; Net margin of 24.2%; Gross margin of 70.6%; Current ratio of 4.58 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.05; Free cash flow per share is positive (1.65); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 55.8%; 2 consecutive earnings beats; EPS growth decelerating (+183.3% -> +8.8% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full CDNA Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime