Get the Weekly Intelligence Brief — top committee picks every Sunday.
CORT · NASDAQ · STOCK

Corcept Therapeutics (CORT) Stock Analysis

Healthcare Updated October 14, 2026
$113.79
52W $28.66 – $126.38
62/100
$12.73B
226.5
0.45
AI Committee Verdict
Buy
62/100
Conviction: Contested · 67% agreement · 6 analysts
+0.9%
-6.6%
0.13:1
Contested
⚠
Buy rating, but near-term risk/reward is unfavorable
The long-term recommendation is based on the composite investment score. The near-term risk/reward is based on nearby support and resistance levels. These can differ when a strong company trades close to resistance with support further below.

Is CORT Bullish or Bearish?

Bullish. Innellis AI committee rates Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (CORT) Buy with a composite score of 62/100 , based on 6 analysts with 67% agreement. Last updated October 14, 2026.

What Would Change This View

Upgrade to Strong Buy
Requires a committee score of 75.0 — +12.84 from today. Applies on the first day at or above the line; upgrades are never dampened.
Downgrade to Watch
Requires the score to fall below 55.0 — -7.16 from today. The band boundary is 60.0, but a one-step downgrade must clear a further margin first. A score oscillating around the line should not change the rating every night.

Executive Summary

The committee is genuinely divided. Risk Analyst sees a compelling case — low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. Portfolio Manager remains cautious — 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.

Bull & Bear Case

Bull Case
  • Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
  • Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
  • MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
  • Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
  • Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
  • Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
  • P/E of 233.2 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
  • Price-to-book of 11.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
  • EPS declining -62.5% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
Both cases are generated from quantitative data signals, not qualitative or forward-looking judgement. They summarise what the numbers say today.
Price History (6M)

AI Investment Committee

Committee Consensus As of October 14, 2026
Overall Committee Score
62/100
Agreement
67%
Analysts
6
Conviction
Contested
Sector Rank
Top 18%
of 192 Healthcare peers
Value Analyst bearish
40 / 100 · Moderate confidence
Multiples don't clear a genuine value bar here, or cheapness looks justified by weak fundamentals
− P/E of 233.2 is expensive by classic value standards
Growth Analyst neutral
57 / 100 · High confidence
Moderate growth -- present but not remarkable
+ Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive
− EPS declining -62.5% YoY despite any revenue growth
Technical Analyst bullish
69 / 100 · High confidence
Price action is constructive -- trend and momentum agree
+ Price structure making higher highs and higher lows
Risk Analyst bullish
80 / 100 · Low confidence
Risk profile is manageable -- leverage, volatility, and event exposure all look contained
+ Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock
Macro Analyst bullish
65 / 100 · Low confidence
Macro backdrop is supportive of risk assets generally, and this name's beta works in its favor
News Analyst bullish
63 / 100 · Low confidence
News flow and recent filings/analyst actions are net positive
+ News sentiment is positive (+0.15 across 13 articles, 14d)
Portfolio Manager bearish
35 / 100 · Low confidence
The existing book itself argues for caution here, independent of how good this specific stock looks
− 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already
Open Full Terminal →

Investment Thesis Evolution

Committee score moved marginally from 64.4 to 62.2.

Analyst-level changes:
  • Macro Analyst: score 80->65 (-15).
  • News Analyst: +1 bullish signal(s).
  • Portfolio Manager: score 30->35 (+5).
  • Value Analyst: +1 bearish signal(s).

Comparing 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-14 (1 day apart).

Technical Analysis

RSI (14)
43.9
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.106
Bearish Momentum
Trend Direction
Uptrend
Weekly: Uptrend
Market Structure
Hh Hl
Support
$108.50
Resistance
$117.20
Bollinger %B
0.45
Inside Bands
Price vs Moving Averages
EMA 9
$118.27 Below
EMA 21
$117.04 Below
EMA 50
$112.17 Above
EMA 200
$86.60 Above

Fundamental Analysis

Valuation
33
Growth
72
Profitability
77
Financial Health
100
Cash Flow
70
Valuation
P/E Ratio 226.5×
P/B Ratio 17.59×
PEG Ratio -3.86
Dividend Yield 0.00%
52W High $126.38
52W Low $28.66
Quality & Growth
ROE 1538.3%
ROA 1191.1%
Gross Margin 9830.5%
Operating Margin 77.1%
Revenue Growth YoY —
Debt / Equity 0.01
AI Fundamental Assessment
P/E ratio of 226.5 (rich relative to a 15-40x range); Price-to-book of 17.6x; PEG ratio of -3.9 (under 1.0 suggests growth is undervalued relative to price); Return on equity of 15.4%; Return on assets of 11.9%; Net margin of 6.6%; Gross margin of 98.3%; Current ratio of 2.86 (healthy short-term liquidity); Debt-to-equity of 0.01; Free cash flow per share is positive (1.01); Most recent quarter beat estimates by 6958.8%; EPS growth accelerating (-250.0% -> +220.0% QoQ); Analyst estimates falling over recent quarters
Get the Full CORT Analysis
Interactive charts · Live committee votes · Trade plan · Paper trading · AI Q&A
Open in Terminal →
Weekly Intelligence Brief
Get the committee's top-scored stocks every Sunday.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime