ALAB vs CGNX
Astera Labs vs Cognex — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | ALAB | CGNX |
|---|
| AI Score |
62
|
64
|
| Price |
$334.03
|
$66.91
|
| P/E Ratio |
154.00×
|
63.70×
|
| ROE |
16.1%
|
7.7%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
75.1%
|
68.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.00×
|
0.04×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.5%
|
| RSI (14) |
54.2
|
54.3
|
| Beta |
3.671
|
1.492
|
| Expected Upside |
+49.3%
|
+7.0%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALAB versus CGNX.
CGNX leads by 2 points.
CGNX scores 64/100 (Buy) versus ALAB at 62/100 (Buy).
ALAB Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 39.0% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 39.0% signals elevated volatility — Risk
CGNX Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 20.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 20.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk