ALV vs FLUT
Autoliv vs Flutter Entertainment plc — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ALV
Autoliv
76
Strong Buy
VS
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
56
Watch
| Metric | ALV | FLUT |
| AI Score |
76
|
56
|
| Price |
$122.26
|
$99.07
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.34×
|
-23.33×
|
| ROE |
28.6%
|
-4.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.2%
|
42.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.88×
|
1.44×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.8%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
49.0
|
47.2
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
1.078
|
| Expected Upside |
+2.1%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALV versus FLUT.
ALV leads by 20 points.
ALV scores 76/100 (Strong Buy) versus FLUT at 56/100 (Watch).
ALV Committee View
100% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is quarter-over-quarter growth rate is accelerating, not just positive. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
Bear Case
- Risk/reward is unfavorable: 6.4% downside vs 2.1% upside.
FLUT Committee View
50% agreement
4 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 21.1% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Weekly trend (downtrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
- VIX regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking — Macro
- Market regime is bullish (Bull market -- normal position sizing) — Macro
Bear Case
- Price structure making lower highs and lower lows — Technical
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 21.1% signals elevated volatility — Risk