ALV vs LAD
Autoliv vs Lithia Motors — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
LAD
Lithia Motors
55
Watch
| Metric | ALV | LAD |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
55
|
| Price |
$122.90
|
$371.97
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.53×
|
12.27×
|
| ROE |
28.6%
|
12.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
19.2%
|
11.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.88×
|
2.58×
|
| Dividend Yield |
2.8%
|
0.6%
|
| RSI (14) |
57.8
|
52.1
|
| Beta |
1.376
|
1.241
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.2%
|
+4.2%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ALV versus LAD.
ALV leads by 8 points.
ALV scores 63/100 (Buy) versus LAD at 55/100 (Watch).
ALV Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is eps declining -7.0% yoy despite any revenue growth. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.7 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 25.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Dividend yield of 2.7% pays you to wait — Value
Bear Case
- EPS declining -7.0% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
LAD Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Value Analyst sees a compelling case — p/e of 11.6 is inexpensive for the broad market. Risk Analyst remains cautious — high leverage (debt-to-equity 2.24) amplifies downside in a stress scenario. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 11.6 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 1.2x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Debt-to-equity of 2.24 adds balance-sheet risk to the value case — Value
- EPS declining -10.6% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical