AME vs CP
Ametek vs Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
CP
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Ltd.
55
Watch
| Metric | AME | CP |
|---|
| AI Score |
70
|
55
|
| Price |
$256.07
|
$91.94
|
| P/E Ratio |
37.31×
|
27.18×
|
| ROE |
13.9%
|
9.0%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
36.6%
|
47.7%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.21×
|
0.54×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.7%
|
| RSI (14) |
67.3
|
57.5
|
| Beta |
0.99
|
1.216
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for AME versus CP.
AME leads by 15 points.
AME scores 70/100 (Buy) versus CP at 55/100 (Watch).
AME Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.21) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is p/e of 36.9 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 36.9 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Weekly RSI at 79 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
CP Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — current ratio of 0.49 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
- Weekly trend (uptrend) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 27.5 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Current ratio of 0.49 is tight -- limited short-term liquidity cushion — Risk