AME vs GNRC
Ametek vs Generac — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | AME | GNRC |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
52
|
| Price |
$241.82
|
$202.03
|
| P/E Ratio |
35.27×
|
46.16×
|
| ROE |
13.9%
|
6.1%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
36.6%
|
39.5%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.21×
|
0.53×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
38.3
|
35.7
|
| Beta |
0.997
|
1.925
|
| Expected Upside |
+0.3%
|
+15.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for AME versus GNRC.
AME leads by 11 points.
AME scores 63/100 (Buy) versus GNRC at 52/100 (Watch).
AME Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.21) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is p/e of 37.3 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.21) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
- P/E of 37.3 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
GNRC Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 17.9% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Weekly trend (sideways) confirms the daily trend -- multi-timeframe agreement — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 50.8 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- EPS declining -25.6% YoY despite any revenue growth — Growth
- Bollinger bandwidth of 17.9% signals elevated volatility — Risk