AME vs NSC
Ametek vs Norfolk Southern — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
NSC
Norfolk Southern
71
Buy
| Metric | AME | NSC |
|---|
| AI Score |
70
|
71
|
| Price |
$256.07
|
$334.62
|
| P/E Ratio |
37.31×
|
28.55×
|
| ROE |
13.9%
|
18.5%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
36.6%
|
53.7%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.21×
|
1.02×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
1.6%
|
| RSI (14) |
67.3
|
43.7
|
| Beta |
0.99
|
1.269
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for AME versus NSC.
NSC leads by 1 points.
NSC scores 71/100 (Buy) versus AME at 70/100 (Buy).
AME Committee View
83% agreement
6 analysts
The primary driver is low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.21) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock. The main limiting factor is p/e of 36.9 is moderate-to-rich. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- P/E of 36.9 is moderate-to-rich — Value
- Price-to-book of 4.4x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Weekly RSI at 79 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
NSC Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 4 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical