AMG vs HLNE
Affiliated Managers Group vs Hamilton Lane — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
63
Buy
VS
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
60
Buy
| Metric | AMG | HLNE |
|---|
| AI Score |
63
|
60
|
| Price |
$369.62
|
$106.25
|
| P/E Ratio |
11.72×
|
16.11×
|
| ROE |
22.1%
|
27.2%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
79.9%
|
69.9%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.99×
|
0.39×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
2.1%
|
| RSI (14) |
54.4
|
68.1
|
| Beta |
1.108
|
1.173
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+2.8%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for AMG versus HLNE.
AMG leads by 3 points.
AMG scores 63/100 (Buy) versus HLNE at 60/100 (Buy).
AMG Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is eps growing 96.0% yoy. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 12.5 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- ROE of 23.4% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- EPS growing 96.0% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
HLNE Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 24.6% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 31.0% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- Price-to-book of 6.1x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 24.6% signals elevated volatility — Risk