APH vs FTNT
Amphenol vs Fortinet — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
| Metric | APH | FTNT |
|---|
| AI Score |
60
|
69
|
| Price |
$170.11
|
$165.94
|
| P/E Ratio |
40.28×
|
55.82×
|
| ROE |
31.8%
|
149.8%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
38.5%
|
80.4%
|
| Debt / Equity |
1.21×
|
0.32×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.5%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
65.4
|
50.7
|
| Beta |
1.251
|
1.075
|
| Expected Upside |
+5.4%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for APH versus FTNT.
FTNT leads by 9 points.
FTNT scores 69/100 (Buy) versus APH at 60/100 (Buy).
APH Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 54.2% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 20.1% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- ROE of 37.1% shows genuine earnings power backing the valuation — Value
- Revenue growing 54.2% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- EPS growing 59.4% YoY — Growth
Bear Case
- P/E of 40.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 12.3x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 20.1% signals elevated volatility — Risk
FTNT Committee View
100% agreement
4 analysts
The primary driver is 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. The main limiting factor is 4 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical