ARW vs CRDO
Arrow Electronics vs Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ARW
Arrow Electronics
71
Buy
VS
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
62
Buy
| Metric | ARW | CRDO |
|---|
| AI Score |
71
|
62
|
| Price |
$206.61
|
$247.50
|
| P/E Ratio |
13.08×
|
94.54×
|
| ROE |
8.7%
|
22.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
11.2%
|
68.0%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.31×
|
0.01×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
34.6
|
61.7
|
| Beta |
1.201
|
3.232
|
| Expected Upside |
+17.1%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ARW versus CRDO.
ARW leads by 9 points.
ARW scores 71/100 (Buy) versus CRDO at 62/100 (Buy).
ARW Committee View
100% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 12.8 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.9x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Revenue growing 26.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
CRDO Committee View
75% agreement
4 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Macro Analyst sees a compelling case — vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 34.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Trend and market structure agree -- coherent bullish picture — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 34.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk