ARW vs DOCN
Arrow Electronics vs DigitalOcean — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ARW
Arrow Electronics
64
Buy
VS
DOCN
DigitalOcean
58
Watch
| Metric | ARW | DOCN |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
58
|
| Price |
$207.11
|
$115.11
|
| P/E Ratio |
12.83×
|
44.67×
|
| ROE |
8.7%
|
-903.7%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
11.2%
|
57.2%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.31×
|
1.61×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
39.8
|
36.2
|
| Beta |
1.201
|
1.586
|
| Expected Upside |
+16.9%
|
+18.5%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ARW versus DOCN.
ARW leads by 6 points.
ARW scores 64/100 (Buy) versus DOCN at 58/100 (Watch).
ARW Committee View
60% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is p/e of 13.2 is inexpensive for the broad market. The main limiting factor is macd histogram negative -- bearish momentum. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 13.2 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.9x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Revenue growing 26.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
DOCN Committee View
40% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 26.2% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
Bear Case
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
- Bollinger bandwidth of 26.2% signals elevated volatility — Risk