ARW vs IONQ
Arrow Electronics vs IonQ, Inc. — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
ARW
Arrow Electronics
71
Buy
VS
| Metric | ARW | IONQ |
|---|
| AI Score |
71
|
63
|
| Price |
$206.61
|
$43.42
|
| P/E Ratio |
13.08×
|
-10.13×
|
| ROE |
8.7%
|
-13.4%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
11.2%
|
36.3%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.31×
|
0.02×
|
| Dividend Yield |
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
34.6
|
63.7
|
| Beta |
1.201
|
3.301
|
| Expected Upside |
+17.1%
|
—
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for ARW versus IONQ.
ARW leads by 8 points.
ARW scores 71/100 (Buy) versus IONQ at 63/100 (Buy).
ARW Committee View
100% agreement
5 analysts
The primary driver is vix regime is low -- calm backdrop supports risk-taking. The main limiting factor is 2 existing position pair(s) are highly correlated already. The committee is constructive but not yet at full conviction.
Bull Case
- P/E of 12.8 is inexpensive for the broad market — Value
- Price-to-book of 0.9x is a discount to asset value — Value
- Revenue growing 26.1% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
Bear Case
- Growth rate is decelerating quarter over quarter -- the trend line matters more than the level — Growth
- MACD histogram negative -- bearish momentum — Technical
IONQ Committee View
50% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — revenue growing 334.6% yoy -- genuine top-line momentum. Value Analyst remains cautious — p/e of 51.6 is expensive by classic value standards. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Revenue growing 334.6% YoY -- genuine top-line momentum — Growth
- MACD histogram positive -- bullish momentum — Technical
- Low leverage (debt-to-equity 0.00) -- balance sheet can absorb a shock — Risk
Bear Case
- P/E of 51.6 is expensive by classic value standards — Value
- Price-to-book of 23.6x prices in significant intangible value — Value
- Bollinger bandwidth of 39.5% signals elevated volatility — Risk