AVT vs MANH
Avnet vs Manhattan Associates — AI-powered side-by-side comparison
VS
MANH
Manhattan Associates
64
Buy
| Metric | AVT | MANH |
|---|
| AI Score |
64
|
64
|
| Price |
$97.33
|
$195.69
|
| P/E Ratio |
14.63×
|
55.46×
|
| ROE |
2.2%
|
69.9%
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
—
|
—
|
| Gross Margin |
10.4%
|
54.6%
|
| Debt / Equity |
0.23×
|
0.34×
|
| Dividend Yield |
1.5%
|
0.0%
|
| RSI (14) |
74.9
|
69.4
|
| Beta |
1.119
|
0.928
|
| Expected Upside |
—
|
+1.1%
|
AI Committee View
Current Innellis committee reasoning for AVT versus MANH.
The committee scores are tied.
AVT and MANH both score 64/100.
AVT Committee View
67% agreement
6 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — eps growing 46.1% yoy. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 18.3% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- Price-to-book of 1.4x is a discount to asset value — Value
- EPS growing 46.1% YoY — Growth
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
Bear Case
- RSI at 75 is in overbought territory — Technical
- Price structure (LH_LL) contradicts the uptrend -- mixed signals — Technical
- Weekly RSI at 75 -- overbought on the larger timeframe too — Technical
MANH Committee View
80% agreement
5 analysts
The committee is genuinely divided. Growth Analyst sees a compelling case — 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution. Risk Analyst remains cautious — bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility. This disagreement is itself the signal — the setup is not clean in either direction.
Bull Case
- 5 consecutive earnings beats -- consistent execution — Growth
- Quarter-over-quarter growth rate is ACCELERATING, not just positive — Growth
- Price structure making higher highs and higher lows — Technical
Bear Case
- Bollinger bandwidth of 42.4% signals elevated volatility — Risk